Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 15-233A
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 15-233A, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 15, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 15,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Procedures in actions for rescission
Official statutory text
Where the action, counter claim, cross claim or plea in
intervention is timely brought for relief based on the theory of
rescission, whether formerly the action would have been denominated
rescission at law or rescission in equity, the service of a pleading
on the adverse party shall be deemed sufficient notice of rescission
and of an offer to restore the benefits received under the contract.
The method of trial to be afforded shall depend on the relief to
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 15. Contracts Page 69
which the party who brought suit on the theory of rescission is
entitled.
intervention is timely brought for relief based on the theory of
rescission, whether formerly the action would have been denominated
rescission at law or rescission in equity, the service of a pleading
on the adverse party shall be deemed sufficient notice of rescission
and of an offer to restore the benefits received under the contract.
The method of trial to be afforded shall depend on the relief to
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 15. Contracts Page 69
which the party who brought suit on the theory of rescission is
entitled.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.