Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 22-22
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 22-22, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 22, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 22,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Policy requiring electronic recording of custodial
Official statutory text
interrogation of homicide or felony sex offense suspects.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 22. Criminal Procedure Page 44
A. As used in this section:
1. "Custodial interrogation" means questioning of a person to
whom warnings given pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436
(1966), are required to be given;
2. "Electronic recording" means audio or audiovisual recording;
provided, an audiovisual recording shall be used when feasible; and
3. "Place of detention" means a fixed location under the
control of a law enforcement agency of this state where individuals
are questioned about alleged crimes.
B. All law enforcement agencies of this state, in collaboration
with the county or district attorney in the appropriate
jurisdiction, shall adopt a detailed written policy requiring
electronic recording of a custodial interrogation of an individual
suspected of homicide or a felony sex offense that is conducted at a
place of detention. A policy adopted pursuant to this section shall
be made available to all officers of the law enforcement agency and
shall be available for public inspection during normal business
hours. A policy adopted pursuant to this section shall include the
following:
1. A requirement that an electronic recording shall be made of
an entire custodial interrogation of an individual suspected of
homicide or a felony sex offense that is conducted at a place of
detention;
2. A requirement that if the defendant elects to make or sign a
written statement during the course of a custodial interrogation
concerning a homicide or a felony sex offense, the making and
signing of the statement shall be electronically recorded;
3. Requirements pertaining to the retention and storage of the
electronic recording; and
4. A statement of exceptions to the requirement for
electronically recording custodial interrogations under this
section, including, but not limited to:
a. an equipment malfunction preventing electronic
recording of the interrogation in its entirety, and
replacement equipment is not immediately available,
b. the officer, in good faith, fails to record the
interrogation because the officer inadvertently fails
to operate the recording equipment properly, or
without the officer's knowledge the recording
equipment malfunctions or stops recording,
c. the suspect affirmatively asserts the desire to speak
with officers without being recorded,
d. multiple interrogations are taking place
simultaneously, exceeding the available electronic
recording capacity,
e. the statement is made spontaneously and not in
response to an interrogation question,
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 22. Criminal Procedure Page 45
f. the statement is made during questioning that is
routinely asked during the processing of an arrest of
a suspect,
g. the statement is made at a time when the officer is
unaware of the suspect's involvement in an offense
covered by the policy,
h. exigent circumstances make recording impractical,
i. at the time of the interrogation, the officer, in good
faith, is unaware of the type of offense involved, and
j. the recording is damaged or destroyed, without bad
faith on the part of any person or entity in control
of the recording.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 22. Criminal Procedure Page 44
A. As used in this section:
1. "Custodial interrogation" means questioning of a person to
whom warnings given pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436
(1966), are required to be given;
2. "Electronic recording" means audio or audiovisual recording;
provided, an audiovisual recording shall be used when feasible; and
3. "Place of detention" means a fixed location under the
control of a law enforcement agency of this state where individuals
are questioned about alleged crimes.
B. All law enforcement agencies of this state, in collaboration
with the county or district attorney in the appropriate
jurisdiction, shall adopt a detailed written policy requiring
electronic recording of a custodial interrogation of an individual
suspected of homicide or a felony sex offense that is conducted at a
place of detention. A policy adopted pursuant to this section shall
be made available to all officers of the law enforcement agency and
shall be available for public inspection during normal business
hours. A policy adopted pursuant to this section shall include the
following:
1. A requirement that an electronic recording shall be made of
an entire custodial interrogation of an individual suspected of
homicide or a felony sex offense that is conducted at a place of
detention;
2. A requirement that if the defendant elects to make or sign a
written statement during the course of a custodial interrogation
concerning a homicide or a felony sex offense, the making and
signing of the statement shall be electronically recorded;
3. Requirements pertaining to the retention and storage of the
electronic recording; and
4. A statement of exceptions to the requirement for
electronically recording custodial interrogations under this
section, including, but not limited to:
a. an equipment malfunction preventing electronic
recording of the interrogation in its entirety, and
replacement equipment is not immediately available,
b. the officer, in good faith, fails to record the
interrogation because the officer inadvertently fails
to operate the recording equipment properly, or
without the officer's knowledge the recording
equipment malfunctions or stops recording,
c. the suspect affirmatively asserts the desire to speak
with officers without being recorded,
d. multiple interrogations are taking place
simultaneously, exceeding the available electronic
recording capacity,
e. the statement is made spontaneously and not in
response to an interrogation question,
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 22. Criminal Procedure Page 45
f. the statement is made during questioning that is
routinely asked during the processing of an arrest of
a suspect,
g. the statement is made at a time when the officer is
unaware of the suspect's involvement in an offense
covered by the policy,
h. exigent circumstances make recording impractical,
i. at the time of the interrogation, the officer, in good
faith, is unaware of the type of offense involved, and
j. the recording is damaged or destroyed, without bad
faith on the part of any person or entity in control
of the recording.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.