Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 22-633
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 22-633, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 22, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 22,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Causes for challenge to panel
Official statutory text
A. A challenge to the panel can be founded only on a material
departure from the forms prescribed by law, in respect to the
drawing and return of the jury, or on the intentional omission of
the sheriff to summon one or more of the jurors drawn from which the
defendant has suffered material prejudice.
B. In any district court where an electronic jury management
system is implemented pursuant to Section 13 of this act, jurors may
be selected and summoned utilizing the automated functionality
provided in the jury management system. Use of an electronic jury
management system shall not be grounds for a challenge to a panel
based on a material departure or irregularity. Whenever the court
utilizes the approved jury management system to randomly select and
sequentially order juror names during any step in the jury selection
process, the laws relating to the use of a jury wheel, and laws
requiring paper ballots drawn from a jury wheel or a shaken box,
shall not apply, including but not limited to those requirements set
forth in Sections 301 through 363 and Sections 591 through 693 of
this title.
R.L. 1910, § 5842. Amended by Laws 2015, c. 242, § 4, emerg. eff.
May 4, 2015.
departure from the forms prescribed by law, in respect to the
drawing and return of the jury, or on the intentional omission of
the sheriff to summon one or more of the jurors drawn from which the
defendant has suffered material prejudice.
B. In any district court where an electronic jury management
system is implemented pursuant to Section 13 of this act, jurors may
be selected and summoned utilizing the automated functionality
provided in the jury management system. Use of an electronic jury
management system shall not be grounds for a challenge to a panel
based on a material departure or irregularity. Whenever the court
utilizes the approved jury management system to randomly select and
sequentially order juror names during any step in the jury selection
process, the laws relating to the use of a jury wheel, and laws
requiring paper ballots drawn from a jury wheel or a shaken box,
shall not apply, including but not limited to those requirements set
forth in Sections 301 through 363 and Sections 591 through 693 of
this title.
R.L. 1910, § 5842. Amended by Laws 2015, c. 242, § 4, emerg. eff.
May 4, 2015.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.