Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 24-120
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 24-120, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 24, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 24,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Voidable and nonvoidable transfers - Creditor's remedies
Official statutory text
and limitations thereon.
A. A transfer or obligation is not voidable as provided for in
paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 5 of this act against a
person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value
or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.
B. Except as otherwise provided for in this section, to the
extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor pursuant to
the provisions of paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 8 of this
act, the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset
transferred, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of
subsection C of this section, or the amount necessary to satisfy the
creditor's claim, whichever is less. The judgment may be entered
against:
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 24. Debtor and Creditor Page 19
1. The first transferee of the asset or the person for whose
benefit the transfer was made; or
2. Any subsequent transferee other than a good faith transferee
who took for value or from any subsequent transferee.
C. If the judgment provided for in subsection B of this section
is based upon the value of the asset transferred, the judgment must
be for an amount equal to the value of the asset at the time of the
transfer, subject to adjustment as the equities may require.
D. Notwithstanding voidability of a transfer or an obligation
pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, a
good faith transferee or obligee is entitled, to the extent of the
value given the debtor for the transfer or obligation, to:
1. A lien on or a right to retain any interest in the asset
transferred;
2. Enforcement of any obligation incurred; or
3. A reduction in the amount of the liability on the judgment.E. A transfer is not voidable pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2 of subsection A of Section 5 or Section 6 of this act if the transfer results
from:
1. Termination of a lease upon default by the debtor when the
termination is pursuant to the lease and applicable law; or
2. Enforcement of a security interest in compliance with
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
F. A transfer is not voidable pursuant to the provisions of
subsection B of Section 6 of this act:
1. To the extent the insider gave new value to or for the
benefit of the debtor after the transfer was made unless the new
value was secured by a valid lien; or
2. If made in the ordinary course of business or financial
affairs of the debtor and the insider; or
3. If made pursuant to a good-faith effort to rehabilitate the
debtor and the transfer secured present value given for that purpose
as well as an antecedent debt of the debtor.
A. A transfer or obligation is not voidable as provided for in
paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 5 of this act against a
person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value
or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.
B. Except as otherwise provided for in this section, to the
extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor pursuant to
the provisions of paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 8 of this
act, the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset
transferred, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of
subsection C of this section, or the amount necessary to satisfy the
creditor's claim, whichever is less. The judgment may be entered
against:
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 24. Debtor and Creditor Page 19
1. The first transferee of the asset or the person for whose
benefit the transfer was made; or
2. Any subsequent transferee other than a good faith transferee
who took for value or from any subsequent transferee.
C. If the judgment provided for in subsection B of this section
is based upon the value of the asset transferred, the judgment must
be for an amount equal to the value of the asset at the time of the
transfer, subject to adjustment as the equities may require.
D. Notwithstanding voidability of a transfer or an obligation
pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, a
good faith transferee or obligee is entitled, to the extent of the
value given the debtor for the transfer or obligation, to:
1. A lien on or a right to retain any interest in the asset
transferred;
2. Enforcement of any obligation incurred; or
3. A reduction in the amount of the liability on the judgment.E. A transfer is not voidable pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2 of subsection A of Section 5 or Section 6 of this act if the transfer results
from:
1. Termination of a lease upon default by the debtor when the
termination is pursuant to the lease and applicable law; or
2. Enforcement of a security interest in compliance with
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
F. A transfer is not voidable pursuant to the provisions of
subsection B of Section 6 of this act:
1. To the extent the insider gave new value to or for the
benefit of the debtor after the transfer was made unless the new
value was secured by a valid lien; or
2. If made in the ordinary course of business or financial
affairs of the debtor and the insider; or
3. If made pursuant to a good-faith effort to rehabilitate the
debtor and the transfer secured present value given for that purpose
as well as an antecedent debt of the debtor.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.