Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-1-4-116
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-1-4-116, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 27A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 27A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Disclosure by court or administrative hearings
Official statutory text
officials.
A. A court or administrative hearings official with competent
jurisdiction may require disclosure of a portion of an audit report
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Page 51
in a civil or administrative proceeding if the court or
administrative hearings official determines, after an in camera
review consistent with the appropriate rules of procedure, that:
1. The privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose;
2. The portion of the audit report is not subject to the
privilege under Section 8 of this act; or
3. The portion of the audit report shows evidence of
noncompliance with an environmental or health and safety law and
appropriate efforts to achieve compliance with the law were not
promptly initiated and pursued with reasonable diligence after
discovery of noncompliance.
B. A party seeking disclosure under this section has the burden
of proving that paragraph 1, 2 or 3 of subsection A of this section
applies.
C. Notwithstanding Section 250 et seq. of Title 75 of the
Oklahoma Statutes, a decision of an administrative hearings official
under paragraph 1, 2 or 3 of subsection A of this section is
directly appealable to a court of competent jurisdiction without
disclosure of the audit report to any person unless so ordered by
the court.
D. A person claiming the privilege is subject to sanctions as
provided by Section 3226.1 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes if
the court finds that the person willfully or knowingly claimed the
privilege for information as provided in Section 8 of this act.
E. A determination of a court under this section is subject to
interlocutory appeal to an appropriate appellate court.
A. A court or administrative hearings official with competent
jurisdiction may require disclosure of a portion of an audit report
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Page 51
in a civil or administrative proceeding if the court or
administrative hearings official determines, after an in camera
review consistent with the appropriate rules of procedure, that:
1. The privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose;
2. The portion of the audit report is not subject to the
privilege under Section 8 of this act; or
3. The portion of the audit report shows evidence of
noncompliance with an environmental or health and safety law and
appropriate efforts to achieve compliance with the law were not
promptly initiated and pursued with reasonable diligence after
discovery of noncompliance.
B. A party seeking disclosure under this section has the burden
of proving that paragraph 1, 2 or 3 of subsection A of this section
applies.
C. Notwithstanding Section 250 et seq. of Title 75 of the
Oklahoma Statutes, a decision of an administrative hearings official
under paragraph 1, 2 or 3 of subsection A of this section is
directly appealable to a court of competent jurisdiction without
disclosure of the audit report to any person unless so ordered by
the court.
D. A person claiming the privilege is subject to sanctions as
provided by Section 3226.1 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes if
the court finds that the person willfully or knowingly claimed the
privilege for information as provided in Section 8 of this act.
E. A determination of a court under this section is subject to
interlocutory appeal to an appropriate appellate court.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.