Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-2-3-507
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-2-3-507, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 27A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 27A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Compliance schedules
Official statutory text
Political subdivisions may, when compliance with environmental
standards would create excessive debt, enter into compliance
schedules with the Department of Environmental Quality to prioritize
compliance based on their greatest environmental or other public
health and safety needs. Excessive debt is indicated when the work
needed for compliance would require a capital cost or user charge
significantly beyond the per-household cost for similar sized
communities within the state. Penalties shall not be assessed if a
political subdivision complies with the schedule authorized by the
Department.
standards would create excessive debt, enter into compliance
schedules with the Department of Environmental Quality to prioritize
compliance based on their greatest environmental or other public
health and safety needs. Excessive debt is indicated when the work
needed for compliance would require a capital cost or user charge
significantly beyond the per-household cost for similar sized
communities within the state. Penalties shall not be assessed if a
political subdivision complies with the schedule authorized by the
Department.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.