Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-3-8-103

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 27A, § 27A-3-8-103, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 27A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 27A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

North Canadian Watershed Restoration Revolving Fund

Official statutory text

There is hereby created in the State Treasury a revolving fund

for the Oklahoma Conservation Commission to be designated the "North

Canadian Watershed Restoration Revolving Fund". The fund shall be a

continuing fund, not subject to fiscal year limitations, and shall

consist of all monies received by the Conservation Commission from

appropriations, federal grants or funds, municipal contributions,

private contributions, and any other sources, including interest

earned from the income in the fund, that are designated for deposit

to such fund or designated for duties associated with harmful woody

species removal from the North Canadian Watershed. All monies

accruing to the credit of said fund are hereby appropriated and may

be budgeted and expended by the Conservation Commission to perform

the duties imposed on the Commission by law. Expenditures from said

fund shall be made upon warrants issued by the State Treasurer

against claims filed as prescribed by law with the Director of the

Office of Management and Enterprise Services for approval and

payment.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.