Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 36-6470.12

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 36-6470.12, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 36, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 36,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Discounting of loss and loss adjustment expense

Official statutory text

reserves – Actuarial opinion.

A. Upon written application, accompanied by such information as

the Commissioner requires, the Insurance Commissioner may grant

permission to a sponsored captive insurance company or a special

purpose captive insurance company to discount loss and loss

adjustment expense reserves at treasury rates applied to the

Oklahoma Statutes - Title 36. Insurance Page 1221

applicable payments projected through the use of the expected

payment pattern associated with the reserves.

B. A sponsored captive insurance company and a special purpose

captive insurance company, and any captive insurer, at the

Commissioner's discretion, shall file annually an actuarial opinion

on the company's loss and loss adjustment expense reserves or life

and health policy and claim reserves, as applicable. The individual

who prepares the Statement of Actuarial Opinion must be independent

of the captive company and its affiliates.

C. The Insurance Commissioner may disallow the discounting of

reserves if a captive insurance company violates a provision of this

title.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.