Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 36-6570.4
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 36, § 36-6570.4, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 36, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 36,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Appeals to be reviewed by physician or licensed mental
Official statutory text
health professional.
A utilization review entity shall ensure that all appeals are
reviewed by a physician or licensed mental health professional. The
physician or licensed mental health professional shall:
1. Possess a current and valid unrestricted license in any
United States jurisdiction;
2. Be of the same or similar specialty as a physician or
licensed mental health professional who typically manages the
medical condition or disease, which means that the physician either
maintains board certification for the same or similar specialty as
the medical condition in question or whose training and experience:
a. includes treating the condition,
b. includes treating complications that may result from
the service or procedure, and
c. is sufficient for the physician or licensed mental
health professional to determine if the service or
procedure is medically necessary or clinically
appropriate,
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 36. Insurance Page 1311
except for appeals coming from a licensed mental health
professional, which may be conducted by another licensed mental
health professional as opposed to a physician;
3. Not have been directly involved in making the adverse
determination;
4. Not have any financial interest in the outcome of the
appeal; and
5. Consider all known clinical aspects of the health care
service under review, including, but not limited to, a review of
those medical records which are pertinent and relevant to the active
condition provided to the utilization review entity by the
enrollee's health care provider, or a health care facility, and any
pertinent medical literature provided to the utilization review
entity by the health care provider.
A utilization review entity shall ensure that all appeals are
reviewed by a physician or licensed mental health professional. The
physician or licensed mental health professional shall:
1. Possess a current and valid unrestricted license in any
United States jurisdiction;
2. Be of the same or similar specialty as a physician or
licensed mental health professional who typically manages the
medical condition or disease, which means that the physician either
maintains board certification for the same or similar specialty as
the medical condition in question or whose training and experience:
a. includes treating the condition,
b. includes treating complications that may result from
the service or procedure, and
c. is sufficient for the physician or licensed mental
health professional to determine if the service or
procedure is medically necessary or clinically
appropriate,
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 36. Insurance Page 1311
except for appeals coming from a licensed mental health
professional, which may be conducted by another licensed mental
health professional as opposed to a physician;
3. Not have been directly involved in making the adverse
determination;
4. Not have any financial interest in the outcome of the
appeal; and
5. Consider all known clinical aspects of the health care
service under review, including, but not limited to, a review of
those medical records which are pertinent and relevant to the active
condition provided to the utilization review entity by the
enrollee's health care provider, or a health care facility, and any
pertinent medical literature provided to the utilization review
entity by the health care provider.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.