Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-551-109

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-551-109, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 43, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 43,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Appearance and limited immunity

Official statutory text

APPEARANCE AND LIMITED IMMUNITY

A. A party to a child custody proceeding, including a

modification proceeding, or a petitioner or respondent in a

proceeding to enforce or register a child custody determination is

not subject to personal jurisdiction in this state for another

proceeding or purpose solely by reason of having participated, or

Oklahoma Statutes - Title 43. Marriage and Family Page 146

having been physically present for the purpose of participating, in

the proceeding.

B. A person who is subject to personal jurisdiction in this

state on a basis other than physical presence is not immune from

service of process in this state. A party present in this state who

is subject to the jurisdiction of another state is not immune from

service of process allowable under the laws of that state.

C. The immunity granted by subsection A of this section does

not extend to civil litigation based on acts unrelated to the

participation in a proceeding under this act committed by an

individual while present in this state.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.