Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-601-708
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 43, § 43-601-708, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 43, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 43,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Recognition and enforcement of registered convention
Official statutory text
support orders - Exceptions
A. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this
section, a tribunal of this state shall recognize and enforce a
registered convention support order.
B. The following grounds are the only grounds on which a
tribunal of this state may refuse recognition and enforcement of a
registered convention support order:
1. Recognition and enforcement of the order is manifestly
incompatible with public policy, including the failure of the
issuing tribunal to observe minimum standards of due process, which
include notice and an opportunity to be heard;
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 43. Marriage and Family Page 207
2. The issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction consistent
with Section 601-201 of this title;
3. The order is not enforceable in the issuing country;
4. The order was obtained by fraud in connection with a matter
of procedure;
5. A record transmitted in accordance with Section 601-706 of
this title lacks authenticity or integrity;
6. A proceeding between the same parties and having the same
purpose is pending before a tribunal of this state and that
proceeding was the first to be filed;
7. The order is incompatible with a more recent support order
involving the same parties and having the same purpose if the more
recent support order is entitled to recognition and enforcement
under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act in this state;
8. Payment, to the extent alleged arrears have been paid in
whole or in part;
9. In a case in which the respondent neither appeared nor was
represented in the proceeding in the issuing foreign country:
a. if the law of that country provides for prior notice
of proceedings, the respondent did not have proper
notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be
heard, or
b. if the law of that country does not provide for prior
notice of the proceedings, the respondent did not have
proper notice of the order and an opportunity to be
heard in a challenge or appeal on fact or law before a
tribunal, or
10. The order was made in violation of Section 601-711 of this
title.
C. If a tribunal of this state does not recognize a convention
support order under paragraphs 2, 4 or 9 of subsection B of this
section:
1. The tribunal may not dismiss the proceeding without allowing
a reasonable time for a party to request the establishment of a new
convention support order; and
2. The Oklahoma Department of Human Services shall take all
appropriate measures to request a child support order for the
obligee if the application for recognition and enforcement was
received under Section 601-704 of this title.
A. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this
section, a tribunal of this state shall recognize and enforce a
registered convention support order.
B. The following grounds are the only grounds on which a
tribunal of this state may refuse recognition and enforcement of a
registered convention support order:
1. Recognition and enforcement of the order is manifestly
incompatible with public policy, including the failure of the
issuing tribunal to observe minimum standards of due process, which
include notice and an opportunity to be heard;
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 43. Marriage and Family Page 207
2. The issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction consistent
with Section 601-201 of this title;
3. The order is not enforceable in the issuing country;
4. The order was obtained by fraud in connection with a matter
of procedure;
5. A record transmitted in accordance with Section 601-706 of
this title lacks authenticity or integrity;
6. A proceeding between the same parties and having the same
purpose is pending before a tribunal of this state and that
proceeding was the first to be filed;
7. The order is incompatible with a more recent support order
involving the same parties and having the same purpose if the more
recent support order is entitled to recognition and enforcement
under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act in this state;
8. Payment, to the extent alleged arrears have been paid in
whole or in part;
9. In a case in which the respondent neither appeared nor was
represented in the proceeding in the issuing foreign country:
a. if the law of that country provides for prior notice
of proceedings, the respondent did not have proper
notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be
heard, or
b. if the law of that country does not provide for prior
notice of the proceedings, the respondent did not have
proper notice of the order and an opportunity to be
heard in a challenge or appeal on fact or law before a
tribunal, or
10. The order was made in violation of Section 601-711 of this
title.
C. If a tribunal of this state does not recognize a convention
support order under paragraphs 2, 4 or 9 of subsection B of this
section:
1. The tribunal may not dismiss the proceeding without allowing
a reasonable time for a party to request the establishment of a new
convention support order; and
2. The Oklahoma Department of Human Services shall take all
appropriate measures to request a child support order for the
obligee if the application for recognition and enforcement was
received under Section 601-704 of this title.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.