Okla. Stat. tit. 59, § 59-637.2

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 59, § 59-637.2, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 59, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 59,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Reconsideration of revocation or suspension of licensure

Official statutory text

— Application to reinstate.

A. At any time after the State Board of Osteopathic Examiners

has revoked or suspended the license of any person to practice

osteopathic medicine or surgery, the Board, upon its own motion and

of its own authority and right, may reconsider such order and

decision for any reason deemed by it to be sufficient and may, in

its discretion, reinstate the license of such person.

B. At any time after the expiration of twelve (12) months from

the date the license of any person to practice osteopathic medicine

or surgery has been revoked with the right to reapply, or at any

time after the expiration of six (6) months from the date the

license of any person to practice osteopathic medicine or surgery

has been suspended by the Board, such person whose license has been

so revoked or suspended may file an application with the executive

director of the Board, together with an application fee set by the

Board, to reinstate the license. The Board may further prescribe

through rule a process in which an application to reinstate such

license may be pursued.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.