Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-1914.11

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-1-1914.11, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Alternative informal dispute resolution -

Official statutory text

Definitions.

For purposes of Sections 3 through 8 of this act:

1. “Impartial decision-making panel” means a group of

individuals who are qualified volunteers and employees or

contractors with the State Department of Health and shall consist of

five (5) members as follows:

a. two members shall be impartial representative

volunteers who have experience in the operation of a

long-term care setting, such as an administrator,

operator or director of nursing,

b. one member shall be an employee of the Department who

has experience in the survey process,

c. one member shall be a person representing the aging or

disabled community, and

d. one member shall be an impartial person who is not

employed by the Protective Health Services, Long-Term

Care Division of the State Department of Health; and

2. “Alternative informal dispute resolution” means a

nonjudicial process or forum before an impartial decision-making

panel that provides a facility cited for deficiency with the

opportunity to dispute a citation for deficiency within the pilot

program established in Sections 3 through 8 of this act.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.