Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-312.1
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-312.1, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Prescription of anabolic steroids or human growth
Official statutory text
hormones.
A. A licensed practitioner as defined in Section 355 of Title
59 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall not prescribe, dispense, deliver,
or administer an anabolic steroid or human growth hormone or cause
an anabolic steroid or human growth hormone to be administered under
the direction or supervision of the practitioner except for a valid
medical purpose and in the course of a professional practice. A
valid medical purpose for the use of anabolic steroids or human
growth hormones shall not include bodybuilding, muscle enhancement
or increasing muscle bulk or strength of a person who is in good
health. This section shall not prohibit the use of anabolic
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 962
steroids for the treatment of livestock or domestic animals in
accordance with state or federal law.
B. The prescribing, dispensing, delivering or administering of
an anabolic steroid by a licensed practitioner in violation of the
provisions of subsection A of this section shall be grounds for
revocation or nonrenewal of the license of such licensed
practitioner to practice in this state. In addition, any licensed
practitioner prescribing, dispensing, delivering or administering an
anabolic steroid in violation of the provisions of subsection A of
this section, upon conviction thereof shall be guilty of a Class D3
felony offense punishable by imprisonment as provided for in
subsections B through F of Section 20P of Title 21 of the Oklahoma
Statutes, or by a fine not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars
($10,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and fine.
A. A licensed practitioner as defined in Section 355 of Title
59 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall not prescribe, dispense, deliver,
or administer an anabolic steroid or human growth hormone or cause
an anabolic steroid or human growth hormone to be administered under
the direction or supervision of the practitioner except for a valid
medical purpose and in the course of a professional practice. A
valid medical purpose for the use of anabolic steroids or human
growth hormones shall not include bodybuilding, muscle enhancement
or increasing muscle bulk or strength of a person who is in good
health. This section shall not prohibit the use of anabolic
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 962
steroids for the treatment of livestock or domestic animals in
accordance with state or federal law.
B. The prescribing, dispensing, delivering or administering of
an anabolic steroid by a licensed practitioner in violation of the
provisions of subsection A of this section shall be grounds for
revocation or nonrenewal of the license of such licensed
practitioner to practice in this state. In addition, any licensed
practitioner prescribing, dispensing, delivering or administering an
anabolic steroid in violation of the provisions of subsection A of
this section, upon conviction thereof shall be guilty of a Class D3
felony offense punishable by imprisonment as provided for in
subsections B through F of Section 20P of Title 21 of the Oklahoma
Statutes, or by a fine not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars
($10,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and fine.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.