Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-432
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 63-2-432, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 63, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 63,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Attachments of assets - Execution of judgment - Exempt
Official statutory text
property - Property seized by forfeiture.
A. A plaintiff under the Drug Dealer Liability Act, subject to
subsection C of this section, may request an ex parte prejudgment
attachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant
sufficient to satisfy a potential award. If attachment is
instituted, a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing.
Attachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the
assets will be available for a potential award of if the defendant
posts a bond sufficient to cover a potential award.
B. A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under the
Drug Dealer Liability Act is not eligible to exempt any property, of
whatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on the
judgment.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 1013
C. Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under the Drug
Dealer Liability Act that are named in a forfeiture section or have
been seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be
used to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been
released following the conclusion of the forfeiture action or
released by the agency that seized the assets.
A. A plaintiff under the Drug Dealer Liability Act, subject to
subsection C of this section, may request an ex parte prejudgment
attachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant
sufficient to satisfy a potential award. If attachment is
instituted, a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing.
Attachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the
assets will be available for a potential award of if the defendant
posts a bond sufficient to cover a potential award.
B. A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under the
Drug Dealer Liability Act is not eligible to exempt any property, of
whatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on the
judgment.
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 63. Public Health and Safety Page 1013
C. Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under the Drug
Dealer Liability Act that are named in a forfeiture section or have
been seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be
used to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been
released following the conclusion of the forfeiture action or
released by the agency that seized the assets.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.