Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Okla. Stat. tit. 76, § 76-58.1

This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 76, § 76-58.1, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 76, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 76,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Subsequent measures not admissible - Exceptions

Official statutory text

When, after an injury or harm allegedly caused by an event,

measures are taken that, if taken previously, would have made the

injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent

measures is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a

defect in a product, a defect in a product's design, or a need for a

warning or instruction. This rule does not require the exclusion of

evidence of subsequent measures when offered for another purpose,

such as proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary

measures, if controverted, or impeachment.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?

Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.