Okla. Stat. tit. 85A, § 85A-86
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 85A, § 85A-86, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 85A, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 85A,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Controversion of employee's right to claim compensation
Official statutory text
A. 1. Each employer desiring to controvert an employee's right
to compensation may file with the Workers' Compensation Commission
on or before the fifteenth day following notice of the alleged
injury or death a statement on a form prescribed by the Commission
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 85A. Workers' Compensation Page 110
that the right to compensation is controverted and the grounds for
the controversion, the names of the claimant, employer, and carrier,
if any, and the date and place of the alleged injury or death.
2. Failure to file the statement of controversion shall not
preclude the employer's ability to controvert the claim or cause it
to waive any defenses. The employer can make additional defenses
not included in the initial notice at any time.
B. If an employer is unable to obtain sufficient medical
information as to the alleged injury or death within fifteen (15)
days following receipt of notice, although the employer has acted in
good faith and with all due diligence, the employer may apply in
writing for an extension of time for making payment of the first
installment or controverting the claim. This written application is
to be postmarked within the fifteen-day period. The Commission may,
in its discretion, grant the extension and fix the additional time
to be allowed. Filing of application for an extension shall not be
deemed to be a controversion of the claim.
C. The provisions in subsection B of this section shall not
apply in cases where the physician is an employee of, on retainer
with, or has a written contract to provide medical services for the
employer.
to compensation may file with the Workers' Compensation Commission
on or before the fifteenth day following notice of the alleged
injury or death a statement on a form prescribed by the Commission
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 85A. Workers' Compensation Page 110
that the right to compensation is controverted and the grounds for
the controversion, the names of the claimant, employer, and carrier,
if any, and the date and place of the alleged injury or death.
2. Failure to file the statement of controversion shall not
preclude the employer's ability to controvert the claim or cause it
to waive any defenses. The employer can make additional defenses
not included in the initial notice at any time.
B. If an employer is unable to obtain sufficient medical
information as to the alleged injury or death within fifteen (15)
days following receipt of notice, although the employer has acted in
good faith and with all due diligence, the employer may apply in
writing for an extension of time for making payment of the first
installment or controverting the claim. This written application is
to be postmarked within the fifteen-day period. The Commission may,
in its discretion, grant the extension and fix the additional time
to be allowed. Filing of application for an extension shall not be
deemed to be a controversion of the claim.
C. The provisions in subsection B of this section shall not
apply in cases where the physician is an employee of, on retainer
with, or has a written contract to provide medical services for the
employer.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.