4 Pa.C.S. § 1605
This is the official text of 4 Pa.C.S. § 1605, part of Pennsylvania’s Pa.C.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Pennsylvania, published by the state as "Pa.C.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Junket agreements.
Official statutory text
Agreements entered into between a slot machine licensee and a gaming junket enterprise or a gaming junket representative shall include a provision for the termination of the agreement without liability on the part of the slot machine licensee if:
(1) The board orders the suspension, limitation, conditioning, denial or revocation of the license of a gaming junket representative license or occupation permit of a gaming junket representative.
(2) The board disapproves the agreement and requires its termination. Failure to expressly include the termination requirement under this section in the agreement shall not constitute a defense in an action brought relating to the termination of the agreement.
(1) The board orders the suspension, limitation, conditioning, denial or revocation of the license of a gaming junket representative license or occupation permit of a gaming junket representative.
(2) The board disapproves the agreement and requires its termination. Failure to expressly include the termination requirement under this section in the agreement shall not constitute a defense in an action brought relating to the termination of the agreement.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Pennsylvania?
Find a Pennsylvania lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.