Tex. Utilities Code § 253.0203
This is the official text of Tex. Utilities Code § 253.0203, part of Texas’s Utilities Code — regulates utility companies.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§ 253.0203. CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS AND MEDIATION.
Official statutory text
(a) If a broadband provider and an electric cooperative are unable to agree to a new pole attachment contract before the expiration date of an existing contract, the rates, terms, and conditions of the existing contract and the terms and conditions of the electric cooperative's application and permitting processes remain in force:
(1) during the 90-day negotiation period described by Subsection (b) and during the period of any agreed extension;
(2) during the 60-day mediation period described by Subsection (b) and during the period of any agreed extension; and
(3) pending final disposition of any litigation commenced under Subsection (c).
(b) If a broadband provider and an electric cooperative are unable to agree to a new pole attachment contract before the 91st day after the expiration date of an existing contract, and are unable to agree to an extension of the negotiation period for a certain number of days, the broadband provider and electric cooperative shall attempt to resolve any disagreement over the rates, terms, or conditions by submitting the contract negotiations to a mediation process. The mediation process may not extend later than the 60th day after the end of the initial 90-day negotiation period and any agreed extension of that period unless the broadband provider and electric cooperative agree to an extension of the mediation period for a certain number of days. The mediation process must be conducted in a county in which the electric cooperative has distribution poles. The broadband provider and electric cooperative must share equally the expenses for the mediator.
(c) If the mediation process under Subsection (b) does not resolve the disagreement over the rates, terms, or conditions of a new pole attachment agreement, the broadband provider or electric cooperative may file suit in a district court to resolve the disagreement or dispute.
(1) during the 90-day negotiation period described by Subsection (b) and during the period of any agreed extension;
(2) during the 60-day mediation period described by Subsection (b) and during the period of any agreed extension; and
(3) pending final disposition of any litigation commenced under Subsection (c).
(b) If a broadband provider and an electric cooperative are unable to agree to a new pole attachment contract before the 91st day after the expiration date of an existing contract, and are unable to agree to an extension of the negotiation period for a certain number of days, the broadband provider and electric cooperative shall attempt to resolve any disagreement over the rates, terms, or conditions by submitting the contract negotiations to a mediation process. The mediation process may not extend later than the 60th day after the end of the initial 90-day negotiation period and any agreed extension of that period unless the broadband provider and electric cooperative agree to an extension of the mediation period for a certain number of days. The mediation process must be conducted in a county in which the electric cooperative has distribution poles. The broadband provider and electric cooperative must share equally the expenses for the mediator.
(c) If the mediation process under Subsection (b) does not resolve the disagreement over the rates, terms, or conditions of a new pole attachment agreement, the broadband provider or electric cooperative may file suit in a district court to resolve the disagreement or dispute.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Texas?
Find a Texas lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.