Michael Martin Lawyer Reviews & Ratings - Seattle
I joined Siderius Lonergan & Martin in 1995. With more than 35 years experience in federal criminal defense matters, my practice focuses on representing corporate employees and individuals in federal investigations, including grand jury investigations and investigations by federal administrative agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Chemical Safety Board and the National Transportation Safety Board.. From 1981 to 1995, I was an Assistant Federal Public Defender in Seattle, handling more than 1,500 federal criminal matters for indigent clients. I continue to take court appointments as a member of the CJA Panel for the Western District of Washington.. I was lead counsel in United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). In that case, the United States Supreme Court, ruling for the defense, held that whether or not the defense makes a specific request for information that tended to exculpate the defendant, the due process clause of the United States Constitution required that material exculpatory evidence be disclosed to the defense.. I have lectured on Federal Grand Jury Practice, on Jury Selection in federal courts and on the ethical and practical issues faced as pool counsel.. I served as a volunteer lawyer with the Innocence Project Northwest, in which his client, a defendant in the infamous “Wenatchee Sex Ring” cases, spent six years in custody before his conviction was vacated and he was released from prison.. Honors: One of Washington State’s Superlawyers since 2000; one of The Best Lawyers in America since 2003; as one of the Top Lawyers in the United States by Corporate Counsel starting in 2009; one of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers in Washington State since 2011; and one of the Best Lawyers in Washington State since 2011 by Seattle Business Monthly.
Total Reviews 5
Michael Martin
Counties King County - Seattle Metro
98101 Washington State lawyer US Not Available
Are you Michael Martin or Client ? Claim this listing or Submit a review
Save Lawyer to Mylawbamba
Quick Summary Information for lawyer Michael Martin on Lawbamba
- Free or Complimentary consultation may be available for a few hours.
- Seattle Lawyers Fees is generally in the range of $243-$395 per hour.
Compare Michael Martin's Avvo and Yelp Reviews wth other lawyers in zip 98101
White Collar Crime lawyers
How Can I Contact Lawyer Michael Martin for Legal Advice?
Here are a few tips to break the ice once you have chosen your lawyers:
- How many years have you been in practice?
- How many White Collar Crime similair cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle White Collar Crime cases out of court?
- What is your fees and the estimated cost of my specific case?
- Does lawyer Michael Martin offer any Pro bono services?
- What are my next steps to proceed?
Explore more White Collar Crime Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 98101
Saint Louis, Missouri (ZIP 63102) - 1,720.9 miles away
Skokie, Illinois (ZIP 60077) - 1,722.6 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60661) - 1,732.3 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60606) - 1,732.7 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60602) - 1,733.0 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60603) - 1,733.2 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60604) - 1,733.2 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60601) - 1,733.3 miles away
Highland, Illinois (ZIP 62249) - 1,740.6 miles away
Detroit, Michigan (ZIP 48226) - 1,933.2 miles away
Which Lawyers in Seattle Are Rated Higher than Michael Martin?
Michael David Brandt
Reviews
Ys providing unencouraging depressing hopelessness. Finally dropped me for complaining. THIS IS THE ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Ralph Hurvitz
Reviews
Was very rude and dismissive on the phone. Don't bother with washed up lawyers. ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Joy Lockerby
Reviews
Minimum wage. I started to work with Joy on a Thursday in July 2023, but due to her inability to fo ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Daniel W Pelka
Reviews
Has continued case not ready for anything no calls, not investigating or asking for my witnesses, fe ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Courtland Theodore Shafer
Reviews
S and when confronted about why he failed to forward those emails, then he would brush them off by s ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Thomas Fain
Reviews
Astly overrated: he just couldn't be bothered with what he clearly considered my trivial issue, and ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Brian Zuanich
Reviews
T the idea. As my lawyer, Brian accomplished the following: - failed to inform me of a hearing - re ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Stephan Douglas Wakefield
Reviews
S of back and forth, he decided it needed to be revised and he would be doing it not the associate. ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Brian Waid
Reviews
Oals, it would be necessary to file a lawsuit against my co-counsel. In fact, I was the priority lie ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Patricia Kahn
Reviews
Id respond, it was "I'll get back to you tomorrow" Run far, far away from this lawyer! ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5