California Lawyers David Kuiper to David L.

Explore California attorneys like David Kuiper, David Kupetz, David Kwasniewski, David L Wright, David L. Amell, David L. Aronoff, David L. Blinn, and David L. Keligian. in cities like Costa Mesa, San Francisco, Berkeley, San Francisco and Irvine. These attorneys specialize in in Zip codes like 92626, 90071, 92618.

David L. Ditor

David L. Gibbs

David Kwasniew

David L. Amell

David L. Blinn

David L. Cello

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Ditora

Firm: Clement and Associates

2209 J Street , Sacramento , California 95816

Practice Areas: Civil ,Elder ,Nursing Home Negligence

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Gibbs

Firm: The Gibbs Law Firm

201 110 East Avenida Palizada , San Clemente , California 92672

Practice Areas: Bankruptcy

View Profile

David Kwasniewski

Firm: Braunhagey & Borden

747 Front St Fl 4 , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: Ethics & Professional Responsibility

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Amell

Firm: Paul, Hanley & Harley LLP

1608 Fourth Street 300 , Berkeley , California 94710

Practice Areas: Business & Commercial,Environmental ,Medical Malpractice,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Blinn

Firm: Low, Ball and Lynch, A Professional Corporation

505 Montgomery Street 7th Floor 9411 , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: General Practice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Cello

521 Georgia Street , Vallejo , California 94590

Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Criminal Defense, Litigation

View Profile

David L. Chavez

11 Miwok Dr , Novato , California 94947

Practice Areas: Litigation, Intellectual Property

View Profile

David L. Hayutin

Firm: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

725 South Figueroa Street 2800 Californi , Los Angeles , California 90017

Practice Areas: Franchise

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Kupetz

Firm: SulmeyerKupetz

333 S Hope St 35FL , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Business

David Kupetz specializes in troubled transactions, crisis avoidance consultation, workouts, restructurings, reorganizations, bankruptcies, receiverships, assignments for the benefit of creditors, municipal debt adjustment and other non-bankruptcy insolvency proceedings. He represents debtors (in restructurings and workouts and in Chapter 11 reorganization cases), secured creditors, unsecured creditors’ committees, assignees for the benefit of creditors, buyers/sellers of businesses/assets in distressed circumstances and governmental and other entities in insolvency and bankruptcy situations.

Avvo Review

“time, under significant amount of pressure.”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Yelp Rating:

David L. Fisher

Firm: Fisher & Carrasco

Elm Street , San Luis Obispo , California 93401

Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice,Professional Malpractice

Avvo Review

“Go to all hearings or have a family member go. Do not listen to his advice or his words "I can take care of this for you. This will be no problem," ...”

Read on Avvo

Yelp Review

“The team at Fisher Law Office has been stellar in handling my case in San Luis Obispo. From the moment that their office took my case, I knew that I was in...”

Read on Yelp

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Huard

Trident Center East Tower , Los Angeles , California 90064

Practice Areas: Energy ,Natural Resources,Regulatory

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Hickson

Firm: Hickson Kipnis and Barnes, LLP

11975 El Camino Real 200 , San Diego , California 92130

Practice Areas: Estate Planning,Probate ,Trusts

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Gibson

Firm: David L. Gibson

5840 Geary Boulevard 200 941 , San Francisco , California 94121

Practice Areas: Taxation - State & Federal

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Kuiper

Firm: Latham & Watkins LLP

650 Town Center Dr Ste 2000 , Costa Mesa , California 92626

Practice Areas: Corporate , Intellectual Property , Internet , Business, Business

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Frey

Firm: Foley McIntosh Frey and Claytor, Professional Corporation

3675 Mt Diablo Boulevard 250 , Lafayette , California 94549

Practice Areas: Business & Commercial,Estate Planning,Probate ,Taxation - State & Federal,Trusts

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Fehrman

555 West Fifth Street 3500 9 , Los Angeles , California 90013

Practice Areas: Intellectual Property ,Patents

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Cooper

Firm: Bialson, Bergen and Schwab

2600 El Camino Real 300 9430 , Palo Alto , California 94306

Practice Areas: Civil ,Corporate

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L. Aronoff

Firm: Thelen Reid Brown Raysman and Steiner LLP

333 South Hope Street 2900 900 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Corporate ,Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David L Wright

72877 Dinah Shore Dr Ste 103 , Rancho Mirage , California 92270

Practice Areas: Business

View Profile

Lawyers Rating:

David L. Keligian

Firm: Brown & Streza, LLP

40 Pacifica , Irvine , California 92618

Practice Areas: Tax Law, Corporate Law, Venture Capital, Closely Held Business Law, Joint Ventures

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Practice area *

Zip code

Your name *

Email address *

Phone (optional)

Describe your case *

By submitting, you agree to Lawbamba's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Submitting a case description does not create an attorney–client relationship and is not confidential.

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California

Auto collision | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. Hello, I was at a business that had erected temporary barriers through their parking lot to funnel traffic as they wanted. There was no signage. I was driving my RV through there, and the side contacted a tree that was overhanging past the curb into the street I had been funnel into by about 9 inches. Does the business have any responsibility to help with costs, given it was an artificially erected pathway without signage that funneled me into the tree? The tree was not dead and the roadway was in good repair.
California holding deposit | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California I’m located in CA and recently applied to an upstairs apartment on 8/4/26. The next day I was told we were approved and that I needed to come in to drop off a $1,000 “deposit” which I thought was a security deposit. I was trying to put my baby to sleep so my husband dropped it off. Turns out he signed a paper stating it was a holding deposit & that we would be charged if we backed out of renting it. The apartment is currently being renovated so it won’t be ready until mid Sept. We had originally wanted a downstairs unit since we have a small child and two weeks after paying our deposit the manager let us know we could view a downstairs apartment that had just become available. When we viewed it, it was so small and outdated compared to the upstairs unit. She then pointed out that my son may make noise that could bother the downstairs neighbors, we tested the noise level and agreed. It’s not a good fit after all, we told her we changed our mind and today she texted us saying they would be keeping the full amount plus more. She then offered to deduct $500 off first months rent and to offer a 6 month lease instead of 12 so that we wouldn’t “loose the deposit”. Money has been tight and I’m freaking out over the $1,066.66 that they’re keeping. After looking at the holding deposit agreement it…
Being charged with felon in possession of a firearm for a firearm I knew nothing about in a car that’s not mine | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. So about 2 months ago now i was using my buddies vehicle who has a concealed carry license. The car is in his name because it belongs to him. The firearm was in a hidden safe in the bottom of the center console. I guess it was a false bottom. The safe had a biometric fingerprint type thing to gain access to the items inside as well as a PIN code, which I didn’t/don't know. So when I got pulled over it was for window tints. I am searchable because I’m on PRCS for felon in possession of a firearm, which I understand looks bad in this scenario. However it is what it is. I can’t change the past and for this charge right here I am an innocent man in the sense that it's not my firearm and I had no knowledge of the thing being in the car. So when they searched the vehicle they did a real thorough search and after like an hour of sitting in the cop car they came to me and asked me what the code was for the safe. I was confused at first and when they made it clear what they were asking, I told them I don’t know anything about any safe anywhere. So they explain that on the safe, which is hidden at the bottom of the center console, theres a biometric unlock and a keypad to gain access, as well as a physical key, which I…
Dismissing sales personnel after 90 day probationary period ends. Company not paying bonuses / commissions for customer contracts signed during 90 days. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Recently let go after 90 day probationary completed, outside salaried sales position with additional money to be paid for securing signed contracts from new customers. Company committed to pay a % of the sales upon completion of the work at these locations Jobs at new locations can take weeks or months to complete and for the all the costs to reconciled before money is paid out to sales personnel. Typically not a problem if your going to stay and be hired on. It seems that predatory hiring and firing of sales staff is not unusual for this company and have located several others who were also let go after landing contracts and upon completion of their probationary period. No reason given for dismissal No mention of additional money owed ? Has this company found a loophole in the system whereby they are able to keep the commissions for jobs? How are these moneys reported and accounted for ? Is the money due kept by the owner? At some point they had to account for the expenditures of each of these jobs is the money used to offset the labor cost for probationary employees ?. is this something I should pursue ? is it a class action suit because of additional persons ? with whom should I speak ? Location: California
California landlord: AB 1482 exemption notice missing from original lease, added later | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California We own a single-family rental in California. The tenants’ original lease began in 2023 and did not include the AB 1482 single-family home exemption notice. In 2025, after that lease ended, we hired a property manager. They issued a new lease/addendum that did include the AB 1482 exemption language. Our property manager is now telling us that because the exemption notice was missing from the original 2023 lease, the tenancy is still subject to AB 1482. Since we plan to sell the property and remove it from the rental market, they are saying we have to provide one month of rent as relocation assistance, or waive the final month’s rent. My questions are: Does adding the AB 1482 exemption notice in a later lease or renewal make the property exempt going forward, or does the missing notice in the original lease mean the continuous tenancy remains covered by AB 1482? The tenants have also been chronically late with rent for most of the tenancy, often paying after the 12th when rent is due on the 1st, and we have written late-payment notices. Could that repeated pattern support an at-fault just-cause termination under Civil Code § 1946.2, even if they eventually paid each month? We are planning to sell the property and are trying to understand whether a no-fault termination with relocation assistance is really our only option.

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

Previous 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.