Traffic Violations Lawyers in Middleton | 2 available

2 Traffic Violations lawyers are available in Middleton, Wisconsin, including Stephen Mays and John Orth. Lawyers rated on this page have an average Avvo rating of 5.0/5.
№ 1 Traffic Violations Middleton, Wisconsin
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Stephen Mays

Firm: Mays Law Office LLC
6405 Century Ave , Middleton , Wisconsin 53562
Practice Areas: Constitutional, Criminal Defense, Traffic Violations
Avvo Review
“…e court dates to attend about a year later he got rid of a prior owi so I didn't get the felony char…”
Read on Avvo
Lawyers.com Review
“I endorse this lawyer.”
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

John Orth

Firm: Mays Law Office LLC
6405 Century Ave , Middleton , Wisconsin 53562
Practice Areas: Constitutional, Criminal Defense, Traffic Violations, DUI & DWI
Avvo Review
“…and although this situation did change my life, it was for the better. I couldn’t and wouldn’t r…”
Read on Avvo
Lawyers.com Review
“I endorse this lawyer.”

Traffic Violations Lawyers in Middleton, Wisconsin at a Glance

Lawbamba lists 2 Traffic Violations lawyers in Middleton. 2 have Avvo client reviews, averaging 5.0/5 across 7 reviews. The highest Avvo rating (with at least 3 reviews) is Stephen Mays, at 5.0/5 from 5 reviews. You can also browse all Traffic Violations lawyers in Wisconsin.

Traffic Violations lawyers in other Wisconsin cities

Other practice areas in Middleton

Frequently asked questions

How many Traffic Violations lawyers are in Middleton, Wisconsin?
Lawbamba lists 2 Traffic Violations lawyers in Middleton, Wisconsin. 2 of them have Avvo client reviews.
What is the average Avvo rating for Traffic Violations lawyers in Middleton?
Across 7 Avvo client reviews, Traffic Violations lawyers in Middleton average 5.0 out of 5.
Who has the highest Avvo rating among Traffic Violations lawyers in Middleton?
Among lawyers with at least 3 Avvo client reviews, Stephen Mays has the highest rating: 5.0 out of 5 from 5 reviews.
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on public information and user submissions. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.