33 M.R.S. § 113

This is the official text of 33 M.R.S. § 113, part of Maine’s M.R.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Maine, published by the state as "M.R.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

33 §113. Reformation

Official statutory text

Upon the petition of an interested person, a court shall reform a disposition in the manner that most closely approximates the transferor's manifested plan of distribution and so that the reformed disposition is within the 90 years allowed by section 111, subsection 1, paragraph B ; section 111, subsection 2, paragraph B ; or section 111, subsection 3, paragraph B if: [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. B, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]

1. Nonvested property interest or power of appointment. A nonvested property interest or a power of appointment becomes invalid under section 111 ; [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. B, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]

2. Class gift. A class gift is not but might become invalid under section 111 and the time has arrived when the share of any class member is to take effect in possession or enjoyment; or [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. B, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]

3. Certain nonvested property interest not validated. A nonvested property interest that is not validated by section 111, subsection 1, paragraph A can vest but not within 90 years after its creation. [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. B, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Maine?

Find a Maine lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.