38 M.R.S. § 349-N
This is the official text of 38 M.R.S. § 349-N, part of Maine’s M.R.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Maine, published by the state as "M.R.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
38 §349-N. Incentives
Official statutory text
Subject to section 349‑Q , and notwithstanding any other provision of law relating to penalties, the department may adjust or mitigate penalties for violations of environmental requirements in accordance with this section. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
1. No gravity-based penalties. If the department determines that a regulated entity satisfies all of the conditions of section 349‑O , the department may not impose in any administrative proceeding or seek in any civil action any gravity-based penalty for a violation that is discovered and disclosed by the regulated entity. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
2. Reduction of gravity-based penalties by 75%. If the department determines that the regulated entity satisfies the conditions of section 349‑O, subsections 2 to 9 , the department shall reduce by 75% gravity-based penalties that would otherwise be associated with violations discovered and disclosed by the regulated entity. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
3. No recommendation for criminal prosecution. If the department determines that the regulated entity satisfies the conditions of section 349‑O, subsections 2 to 9 , the department may not recommend that criminal charges be brought against the regulated entity if the department determines that the violation is not part of a pattern or practice that demonstrates or involves: A. A prevalent management philosophy or practice that conceals or condones environmental violations; or [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).] B. High-level corporate officials' or managers' conscious involvement in, or willful blindness to, violations of state or federal environmental laws. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).] Whether or not the department recommends the regulated entity for criminal prosecution under this section, the department may recommend for prosecution the criminal acts of individual managers or employees under existing policies guiding the exercise of enforcement discretion. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
4. No routine request for environmental audit reports. The department may not request an environmental audit report in connection with a routine inspection of a regulated entity. If the department has reason to believe that a violation by a regulated entity of an environmental requirement has occurred, the department may seek any information relevant to identifying violations or determining liability or the extent of harm resulting from the violation. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
1. No gravity-based penalties. If the department determines that a regulated entity satisfies all of the conditions of section 349‑O , the department may not impose in any administrative proceeding or seek in any civil action any gravity-based penalty for a violation that is discovered and disclosed by the regulated entity. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
2. Reduction of gravity-based penalties by 75%. If the department determines that the regulated entity satisfies the conditions of section 349‑O, subsections 2 to 9 , the department shall reduce by 75% gravity-based penalties that would otherwise be associated with violations discovered and disclosed by the regulated entity. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
3. No recommendation for criminal prosecution. If the department determines that the regulated entity satisfies the conditions of section 349‑O, subsections 2 to 9 , the department may not recommend that criminal charges be brought against the regulated entity if the department determines that the violation is not part of a pattern or practice that demonstrates or involves: A. A prevalent management philosophy or practice that conceals or condones environmental violations; or [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).] B. High-level corporate officials' or managers' conscious involvement in, or willful blindness to, violations of state or federal environmental laws. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).] Whether or not the department recommends the regulated entity for criminal prosecution under this section, the department may recommend for prosecution the criminal acts of individual managers or employees under existing policies guiding the exercise of enforcement discretion. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
4. No routine request for environmental audit reports. The department may not request an environmental audit report in connection with a routine inspection of a regulated entity. If the department has reason to believe that a violation by a regulated entity of an environmental requirement has occurred, the department may seek any information relevant to identifying violations or determining liability or the extent of harm resulting from the violation. [PL 2011, c. 304, Pt. A, §1 (NEW).]
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Maine?
Find a Maine lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.