9-A M.R.S. § 3-304

This is the official text of 9-A M.R.S. § 3-304, part of Maine’s M.R.S — part of the compiled statutory law of Maine, published by the state as "M.R.S." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

9-A §3-304. Use of multiple agreements

Official statutory text

1. A creditor may not use multiple agreements with intent to obtain a higher finance charge than would otherwise be permitted by the provisions of the Article on Finance Charges and Related Provisions, Article II . [PL 1973, c. 762, §1 (NEW).]

2. With respect to a supervised loan, a lender uses multiple agreements if, with intent to obtain a higher finance charge than would otherwise be permitted, the lender allows any person, or married couple, to become obligated in any way under more than one loan agreement with the lender or with a person related to the lender. [RR 2025, c. 1, Pt. C, §21 (COR).]

3. The intent necessary, under subsections 1 and 2 , shall be rebuttably presumed in any transaction in which a creditor who is required to disclose an annual percentage rate which is greater than 18% per year in a significant portion of its consumer credit transactions uses multiple agreements with the result of obtaining a higher credit service charge than would otherwise be permitted by this Article. [PL 1973, c. 762, §1 (NEW).]

4. The excess amount of finance charge provided for in this section is an excess charge for the purposes of the provisions on rights of parties, section 5‑201 , and the provisions on civil actions by administrator, section 6‑113 . [PL 1973, c. 762, §1 (NEW).]

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Maine?

Find a Maine lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.