Minn. Stat. § 60B.33

This is the official text of Minn. Stat. § 60B.33, part of Minnesota’s Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Minnesota, published by the state as "Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

§ 60B.33 CLAIMS OF HOLDERS OF VOID OR VOIDABLE RIGHTS.

Official statutory text

§ Subdivision 1. Disallowance for failure to surrender property. No claims of a creditor who has received or acquired a preference, lien, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or encumbrance, voidable under sections 60B.01 to 60B.61 , shall be allowed unless the creditor surrenders the preference, lien, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or encumbrance. If the avoidance is effected by a proceeding in which a final judgment has been entered, the claim shall not be allowed unless the money is paid or the property is delivered to the liquidator within 30 days from the date of the entering of the final judgment, except that the court having jurisdiction over the liquidation may allow further time if there is an appeal or other continuation of the proceeding.

§ Subd. 2. Time for filing. A claim allowable under subdivision 1 by reason of the avoidance, whether voluntary or involuntary, of a preference, lien, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or encumbrance may be filed as an excused late filing under section 60B.37 if filed within 30 days from the date of the avoidance or within the further time allowed by the court under subdivision 1.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in Minnesota?

Find a Minnesota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.