Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. DCD Law § 72

This is the official text of N.Y. DCD Law § 72, part of New York’s DCD Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "DCD Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

When insolvent required to produce his non-resident wife

Official statutory text

§ 72. When insolvent required to produce his non-resident wife. Where\nthe petitioner's wife resides without the state, the court, or a judge\nthereof out of court, may, upon the application of any creditor, make an\norder, requiring the petitioner to bring his wife before the court, at\nthe hearing or trial, to the end that she may be examined as a witness.\nA copy of the order must be personally served upon the petitioner, at\nleast three weeks before the hearing. If it appears, upon the hearing,\nthat service could not, with due diligence, be so made, in consequence\nof the petitioner's sickness or absence, the court may, in its\ndiscretion, adjourn the hearing or trial, and prescribe the time and\nmanner of service of the order for the adjourned day. If, after due\nservice, the petitioner's wife does not attend at the time and place\nappointed, the petitioner is not entitled to his discharge, unless he\nproves, to the satisfaction of the court, by his affidavit, or upon his\noral examination, or otherwise, that he was unable to procure her\nattendance.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.