N.Y. PBH Law § 3328
This is the official text of N.Y. PBH Law § 3328, part of New York’s PBH Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "PBH Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Exemptions from title
Official statutory text
§ 3328. Exemptions from title. The following persons engaging in the\nfollowing activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this title:\n 1. A practitioner lawfully administering, dispensing, or prescribing a\ncontrolled substance in the course of his professional practice to an\nultimate user for a recognized medical purpose;\n 2. A licensed manufacturer engaged in research upon non-human subjects\nor chemical analysis conducted on the premises specified in the\nmanufacturer's license;\n 3. A licensed distributor engaged in quality control analysis at the\npremises specified in his license.\n 4. A practitioner or patient participating in a clinical research\nprogram on the therapeutic use of marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols.\n(a) Each such clinical research program shall have received protocol\napproval from the United States Food and Drug Administration, shall\npossess an effective investigational new drug application and shall have\nbeen registered by the Drug Enforcement Administration, United States\nDepartment of Justice.\n (b) Each such clinical research program authorized under the\nprovisions of article thirty-three-A of this chapter.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.