N.Y. UCC Law § 9-335
This is the official text of N.Y. UCC Law § 9-335, part of New York’s UCC Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "UCC Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Accessions
Official statutory text
Section 9--335. Accessions.\n (a) Creation of security interest in accession. A security interest\nmay be created in an accession and continues in collateral that becomes\nan accession.\n (b) Perfection of security interest. If a security interest is\nperfected when the collateral becomes an accession, the security\ninterest remains perfected in the collateral.\n (c) Priority of security interest. Except as otherwise provided in\nsubsection (d), the other provisions of this part determine the priority\nof a security interest in an accession.\n (d) Compliance with certificate-of-title statute. A security interest\nin an accession is subordinate to a security interest in the whole which\nis perfected by compliance with the requirements of a\ncertificate-of-title statute under Section 9--311 (b).\n (e) Removal of accession after default. After default, subject to Part\n6, a secured party may remove an accession from other goods if the\nsecurity interest in the accession has priority over the claims of every\nperson having an interest in the whole.\n (f) Reimbursement following removal. A secured party that removes an\naccession from other goods under subsection (e) shall promptly reimburse\nany holder of a security interest or other lien on, or owner of, the\nwhole or of the other goods, other than the debtor, for the cost of\nrepair of any physical injury to the whole or the other goods. The\nsecured party need not reimburse the holder or owner for any diminution\nin value of the whole or the other goods caused by the absence of the\naccession removed or by any necessity for replacing it. A person\nentitled to reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the\nsecured party gives adequate assurance for the performance of the\nobligation to reimburse.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.