N.Y. VAT Law § 1115
This is the official text of N.Y. VAT Law § 1115, part of New York’s VAT Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "VAT Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Interference with official traffic-control devices, railroad signs or signals and other highway appurtenances
Official statutory text
§ 1115. Interference with official traffic-control devices, railroad\nsigns or signals and other highway appurtenances. (a) No person shall,\nwithout lawful authority, attempt to or in fact alter, deface, injure,\nknock down, cover, remove, or otherwise interfere with any official\ntraffic-control device or any railroad sign or signal, or any\ninscription, shield, or insignia thereon, or any other part thereof; any\nbridge or similar structure; any monument, lamppost, telephone pole,\nfence, walk, curb, tree, rock cut or other appurtenance on a highway\nright of way.\n (b) For the purposes of this section the following terms shall have\nthe following meanings:\n 1. to "deface" shall include, but not be limited to, to damage,\ndestroy, disfigure, erase, ruin, distort, spoil or otherwise change the\nexternal appearance of an object by the use of chalk, crayon, paint,\nstain, ink or other similar material.\n 2. to "alter" a traffic-control signal shall include, but not be\nlimited to, changing or attempting to change the signal indications of a\ntraffic-control signal by use of a traffic-control signal preemption\ndevice.\n 3. "traffic-control signal preemption device" shall mean any device\ndesigned or used to change or attempt to change the signal indications\nof a traffic-control signal.\n (c) The presence in a vehicle of a traffic-control signal preemption\ndevice connected to a power source and in an operable condition is\npresumptive evidence of its use by any person operating such vehicle.\nSuch presumption shall be rebutted by any credible and reliable evidence\nwhich tends to show that such device was not in use.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.