N.D. Cent. Code § 4.1-73-09
This is the official text of N.D. Cent. Code § 4.1-73-09, part of North Dakota’s Cent. Code — part of the compiled statutory law of North Dakota, published by the state as "Cent. Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
4.1-73-09. Cancellation of brand
Official statutory text
4.1-73-09. Cancellation of brand
1. The chief brand inspector shall cancel a legally recorded brand if the chief brand
inspector:
a. Receives for filing a bill of sale for the brand, properly executed by the owner, as
shown in the records of the chief brand inspector;
b. Determines that the brand duplicates a previously recorded brand; or
c. Determines that the brand was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or
other illegal means.
2. The chief brand inspector may cancel a legally recorded brand if the chief brand
inspector determines that the brand has been recorded in another state.
1. The chief brand inspector shall cancel a legally recorded brand if the chief brand
inspector:
a. Receives for filing a bill of sale for the brand, properly executed by the owner, as
shown in the records of the chief brand inspector;
b. Determines that the brand duplicates a previously recorded brand; or
c. Determines that the brand was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or
other illegal means.
2. The chief brand inspector may cancel a legally recorded brand if the chief brand
inspector determines that the brand has been recorded in another state.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in North Dakota?
Find a North Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.