Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-3305
This is the official text of Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 12-3305, part of Oklahoma’s Stat. tit. 12, — part of the compiled statutory law of Oklahoma, published by the state as "Stat. tit. 12,." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Beginning and concluding collaborative law process
Official statutory text
BEGINNING AND CONCLUDING COLLABORATIVE LAW PROCESS.
A. A collaborative law process begins when the parties sign a
collaborative law participation agreement.
B. A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a
collaborative law process over that party’s objection.
C. A collaborative law process is concluded by a:
1. Resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a
signed record;
2. Resolution of a part of the collaborative matter, evidenced
by a signed record, in which the parties agree that the remaining
parts of the matter will not be resolved in the process; or
3. Termination of the process.
D. A collaborative law process terminates:
1. When a party gives notice to other parties in a record that
the process is ended;
2. When a party:
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 12. Civil Procedure Page 547
a. begins a proceeding related to a collaborative matter
without the agreement of all parties, or
b. in a pending proceeding related to the matter:
(1) initiates a pleading, motion, order to show
cause, or request for a conference with the
tribunal,
(2) requests that the proceeding be put on the
tribunal’s active calendar, or
(3) takes similar action requiring notice to be sent
to the parties; or
3. Except as otherwise provided by subsection G of this
section, when a party discharges a collaborative lawyer or a
collaborative lawyer withdraws from further representation of a
party.
E. A party’s collaborative lawyer shall give prompt notice to
all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
F. A party may terminate a collaborative law process with or
without cause.
G. Notwithstanding the discharge or withdrawal of a
collaborative lawyer, a collaborative law process continues, if not
later than thirty (30) days after the date that the notice of the
discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer required by
subsection E of this section is sent to the parties:
1. The unrepresented party engages a successor collaborative
lawyer; and
2. In a signed record:
a. the parties consent to continue the process by
reaffirming the collaborative law participation
agreement,
b. the agreement is amended to identify the successor
collaborative lawyer, and
c. the successor collaborative lawyer confirms the
lawyer’s representation of a party in the
collaborative process.
H. A collaborative law process does not conclude if, with the
consent of the parties, a party requests a tribunal to approve a
resolution of the collaborative matter or any part thereof as
evidenced by a signed record.
I. A collaborative law participation agreement may provide
additional methods of concluding a collaborative law process.
A. A collaborative law process begins when the parties sign a
collaborative law participation agreement.
B. A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a
collaborative law process over that party’s objection.
C. A collaborative law process is concluded by a:
1. Resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a
signed record;
2. Resolution of a part of the collaborative matter, evidenced
by a signed record, in which the parties agree that the remaining
parts of the matter will not be resolved in the process; or
3. Termination of the process.
D. A collaborative law process terminates:
1. When a party gives notice to other parties in a record that
the process is ended;
2. When a party:
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 12. Civil Procedure Page 547
a. begins a proceeding related to a collaborative matter
without the agreement of all parties, or
b. in a pending proceeding related to the matter:
(1) initiates a pleading, motion, order to show
cause, or request for a conference with the
tribunal,
(2) requests that the proceeding be put on the
tribunal’s active calendar, or
(3) takes similar action requiring notice to be sent
to the parties; or
3. Except as otherwise provided by subsection G of this
section, when a party discharges a collaborative lawyer or a
collaborative lawyer withdraws from further representation of a
party.
E. A party’s collaborative lawyer shall give prompt notice to
all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
F. A party may terminate a collaborative law process with or
without cause.
G. Notwithstanding the discharge or withdrawal of a
collaborative lawyer, a collaborative law process continues, if not
later than thirty (30) days after the date that the notice of the
discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative lawyer required by
subsection E of this section is sent to the parties:
1. The unrepresented party engages a successor collaborative
lawyer; and
2. In a signed record:
a. the parties consent to continue the process by
reaffirming the collaborative law participation
agreement,
b. the agreement is amended to identify the successor
collaborative lawyer, and
c. the successor collaborative lawyer confirms the
lawyer’s representation of a party in the
collaborative process.
H. A collaborative law process does not conclude if, with the
consent of the parties, a party requests a tribunal to approve a
resolution of the collaborative matter or any part thereof as
evidenced by a signed record.
I. A collaborative law participation agreement may provide
additional methods of concluding a collaborative law process.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Oklahoma?
Find a Oklahoma lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.