S.D. Codified Laws § 35-1-5.7
This is the official text of S.D. Codified Laws § 35-1-5.7, part of South Dakota’s Codified Laws — part of the compiled statutory law of South Dakota, published by the state as "Codified Laws." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Corkage fee for wine supplied by customer--Removal of partially consumed, sealed bottle of wine--Storage of wine supplied by customer
Official statutory text
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 35-1-5.6 , a licensee that is licensed to sell wine on-sale may permit a customer to bring a sealed and unopened bottle of wine onto the licensed premises for consumption by the customer while eating a meal that was prepared by the licensee and that was served at a table on the licensed premises. The licensee may charge a corkage fee for serving wine supplied by a customer. The customer may carry out the unconsumed portion of the bottle of wine if it is securely resealed by the licensee with a cork or other similar cap and placed in a sealed bag or other container. The licensee shall also attach the receipt for the meal and any corkage fee to the bag or container. The customer may store unconsumed bottles of wine on the licensed premises. The licensee may charge a storage fee for storing wine supplied by the customer.
Source: SL 2012, ch 190, § 1; SL 2014, ch 174, § 1; SL 2018, ch 216, § 1.
Source: SL 2012, ch 190, § 1; SL 2014, ch 174, § 1; SL 2018, ch 216, § 1.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in South Dakota?
Find a South Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.