California Lawyers David Goren to David H.

Explore California attorneys like David Goren, David Grace, David Graeler, David Graff, David Graulich, David Graves, David Green Baskin, and David H. Jaffer. in cities like Redwood City, Los Angeles, Fair Oaks, Santa Cruz and Palo Alto. These attorneys specialize in in Zip codes like 94063, 90067, 94304.

David Goren

David Grace

David H. Fry

David H. Barti

David H King

David Guardado

View Profile

David Goren

Firm: Fish & Richardson P.C.

500 Arguello Street Suite 500 , Redwood City , California 94063

Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Grace

Firm: Loeb & Loeb LLP

10100 Santa Monica Blvd Ste 2100 , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Copyrights, Intellectual Property , Trademarks, Litigation

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David H. Fry

Firm: Munger, Tolles and Olson LLP

560 Mission Street 27th Floor , San Francisco , California 94105

Practice Areas: Civil ,Entertainment & Sports ,Professional Malpractice,Securities

View Profile

David H. Bartick

Firm: David H. Bartick

West Broadway , San Diego , California 92101

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

View Profile

David H King

225 Cedar St , San Diego , California 92101

Practice Areas: Government

View Profile

David Guardado

Firm: County of San Bernardino

Office of County Counsel , San Bernardino , California 92415

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David H. Jaffer

Firm: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

2475 Hanover Street 114 , Palo Alto , California 94304

Practice Areas: Trademarks

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Graves

Firm: Attorneys At Law Laturno & Graves

613 West Valley Parkway,Suite 225 , Escondido , California 92025

Practice Areas: Litigation

Avvo Review

“ll cancel the discount if you refuse to pay on time, due to a dispute. His contract (He's a lawyer,”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

David Graeler

Firm: Nossaman LLP

777 S Figueroa St 34th Fl , Los Angeles , California 90017

Practice Areas: Real Estate

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer. I have known David for 18 years - since our time together in law school. He is always well-prepared and willing to go the "extra yard." He gained valuable tr…”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Gregoire

8535 W Knoll Dr Apt 206 , West Hollywood , California 90069

Practice Areas: Employment & Labor

Avvo Review

“Would give no star if possible Works for Union right now & not member friendly or congenial. Usele”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Greiner

14555 Civic Dr , Victorville , California 92394

Practice Areas: Business

Avvo Review

“d I sleep on it and talk to him in the morning. When I spoke to him in the morning, he had 2 choices”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Grigolla

333 W Foothill Blvd , Glendora , California 91741

Practice Areas: Probate

Avvo Review

“I just needed a consult and that is exactly what I got. Totally reasonable in price. Very informativ”

Read on Avvo

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer's work. David is exceptionally competent and very responsive in all aspects of family law.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Green Baskin

Firm: Baskin and Grant, LLP

730 Mission Street , Santa Cruz , California 95060

Practice Areas: Business & Commercial,Civil ,Corporate ,Real Estate

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Gross

Firm: Plageman, Lund & Cannon LLP

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 950 , Oakland , California 94612

Practice Areas: Business & Commercial, Leases and Leasing, Real Estate , Real Estate

View Profile

David Graulich

Firm: Wronged At Work Law Group

Po Box 2041 , Fair Oaks , California 95628

Practice Areas: Employment & Labor

Lawyers.com Review

“I have referred multiple matters to Mr. Graulich because he cares about the concerns presented by each individual. I endorse this lawyer.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David H. Backenstoe

Firm: Brayton Purcell, LLP

222 Rush Landing Road , Novato , California 94948

Practice Areas: Personal Injury,Products Liability

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Graff

Firm: Jeffer, Mangels, Butler and Marmaro LLP

317 E Carrillo St , Santa Barbara , California 93101

Practice Areas: Taxation - State & Federal, Tax

Lawyers.com Review

“Mr Graff is the go to Attorney for all matters taxation. I highly recommend this Attorney.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David H. Bremer

Firm: Borton Petrini, LLP

535 Pacific Avenue 201 , San Francisco , California 94133

Practice Areas: Construction Defects,Employment & Labor ,Environmental ,Housing ,Insurance ,Medical Malpractice,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David H. Dun

Firm: Dun & Martinek, L.L.P.

2313 I Street PO Box 1266 95501 , Eureka , California 95501

Practice Areas: Contracts

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Grinberg

Firm: Sidley Austin LLP

1999 Avenue Of The Stars , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Corporate Finance, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities , Business

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Practice area *

Zip code

Your name *

Email address *

Phone (optional)

Describe your case *

By submitting, you agree to Lawbamba's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Submitting a case description does not create an attorney–client relationship and is not confidential.

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California

Auto collision | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. Hello, I was at a business that had erected temporary barriers through their parking lot to funnel traffic as they wanted. There was no signage. I was driving my RV through there, and the side contacted a tree that was overhanging past the curb into the street I had been funnel into by about 9 inches. Does the business have any responsibility to help with costs, given it was an artificially erected pathway without signage that funneled me into the tree? The tree was not dead and the roadway was in good repair.
California holding deposit | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California I’m located in CA and recently applied to an upstairs apartment on 8/4/26. The next day I was told we were approved and that I needed to come in to drop off a $1,000 “deposit” which I thought was a security deposit. I was trying to put my baby to sleep so my husband dropped it off. Turns out he signed a paper stating it was a holding deposit & that we would be charged if we backed out of renting it. The apartment is currently being renovated so it won’t be ready until mid Sept. We had originally wanted a downstairs unit since we have a small child and two weeks after paying our deposit the manager let us know we could view a downstairs apartment that had just become available. When we viewed it, it was so small and outdated compared to the upstairs unit. She then pointed out that my son may make noise that could bother the downstairs neighbors, we tested the noise level and agreed. It’s not a good fit after all, we told her we changed our mind and today she texted us saying they would be keeping the full amount plus more. She then offered to deduct $500 off first months rent and to offer a 6 month lease instead of 12 so that we wouldn’t “loose the deposit”. Money has been tight and I’m freaking out over the $1,066.66 that they’re keeping. After looking at the holding deposit agreement it…
Being charged with felon in possession of a firearm for a firearm I knew nothing about in a car that’s not mine | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. So about 2 months ago now i was using my buddies vehicle who has a concealed carry license. The car is in his name because it belongs to him. The firearm was in a hidden safe in the bottom of the center console. I guess it was a false bottom. The safe had a biometric fingerprint type thing to gain access to the items inside as well as a PIN code, which I didn’t/don't know. So when I got pulled over it was for window tints. I am searchable because I’m on PRCS for felon in possession of a firearm, which I understand looks bad in this scenario. However it is what it is. I can’t change the past and for this charge right here I am an innocent man in the sense that it's not my firearm and I had no knowledge of the thing being in the car. So when they searched the vehicle they did a real thorough search and after like an hour of sitting in the cop car they came to me and asked me what the code was for the safe. I was confused at first and when they made it clear what they were asking, I told them I don’t know anything about any safe anywhere. So they explain that on the safe, which is hidden at the bottom of the center console, theres a biometric unlock and a keypad to gain access, as well as a physical key, which I…
Dismissing sales personnel after 90 day probationary period ends. Company not paying bonuses / commissions for customer contracts signed during 90 days. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Recently let go after 90 day probationary completed, outside salaried sales position with additional money to be paid for securing signed contracts from new customers. Company committed to pay a % of the sales upon completion of the work at these locations Jobs at new locations can take weeks or months to complete and for the all the costs to reconciled before money is paid out to sales personnel. Typically not a problem if your going to stay and be hired on. It seems that predatory hiring and firing of sales staff is not unusual for this company and have located several others who were also let go after landing contracts and upon completion of their probationary period. No reason given for dismissal No mention of additional money owed ? Has this company found a loophole in the system whereby they are able to keep the commissions for jobs? How are these moneys reported and accounted for ? Is the money due kept by the owner? At some point they had to account for the expenditures of each of these jobs is the money used to offset the labor cost for probationary employees ?. is this something I should pursue ? is it a class action suit because of additional persons ? with whom should I speak ? Location: California
California landlord: AB 1482 exemption notice missing from original lease, added later | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California We own a single-family rental in California. The tenants’ original lease began in 2023 and did not include the AB 1482 single-family home exemption notice. In 2025, after that lease ended, we hired a property manager. They issued a new lease/addendum that did include the AB 1482 exemption language. Our property manager is now telling us that because the exemption notice was missing from the original 2023 lease, the tenancy is still subject to AB 1482. Since we plan to sell the property and remove it from the rental market, they are saying we have to provide one month of rent as relocation assistance, or waive the final month’s rent. My questions are: Does adding the AB 1482 exemption notice in a later lease or renewal make the property exempt going forward, or does the missing notice in the original lease mean the continuous tenancy remains covered by AB 1482? The tenants have also been chronically late with rent for most of the tenancy, often paying after the 12th when rent is due on the 1st, and we have written late-payment notices. Could that repeated pattern support an at-fault just-cause termination under Civil Code § 1946.2, even if they eventually paid each month? We are planning to sell the property and are trying to understand whether a no-fault termination with relocation assistance is really our only option.

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

Previous 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.