California Lawyers David E. to David Elson

Explore California attorneys like David E. Shell, David E. Simon, David E. Stoll, David E. Tang, David E. Wang, David E. Watson, David E. Webster, and David Elson. in cities like Ukiah, San Francisco, Irvine, San Francisco and Los Angeles. These attorneys specialize in in Zip codes like 95482, 90266, 90064.

David E. Shell

David Egdal

David E. Stoll

David E. Tang

David Elkins

David E. Webst

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Shell

Firm: Shell, David E.

Oak Street , Ukiah , California 95482

Practice Areas: Landlord & Tenant

View Profile

David Egdal

Firm: Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP

1 Maritime Plz Fl 18 , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: Real Estate , Real Estate

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Stoll

Firm: Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Russ Building 235 Montgomery Street , San Francisco , California 94104

Practice Areas: Corporate ,Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Tang

Firm: Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk and Rabkin, A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center 7th Floor , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: Corporate ,Securities

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Elkins

Firm: Squire Patton Boggs (Us) LLP

1841 Page Mill Rd Ste 150 , Palo Alto , California 94304

Practice Areas: Arbitration & Mediation, Civil , Intellectual Property , Patents, Intellectual Property

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer's work.”

View Profile

David E. Webster

600 Montgomery Street 1Fourth Floor 9 , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: Real Estate

View Profile

David Eldan

Firm: Office of The Attorney General

300 S Spring St Ste 1702 , Los Angeles , California 90013

Practice Areas: Business

Lawyers.com Review

“I am very impressed with David Eldan and his credentials. I endorse this attorney.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Earl Jacobs

Firm: Jacobs, David E.

225 S Civic Dr Ste 12 2 , Palm Springs , California 92262

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

Avvo Review

“I've know David for nine years. His expertise and passion is terrific. He is a dedicated family man. A champion for the rights of others.”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

David Edsall

Firm: Law Offices of Jerry L. Freedman, P.C.

15315 Magnolia Boulevard Suite 408 , Sherman Oaks , California 91403

Practice Areas: Business

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Simon

Firm: Simon and Simon, LLP

1230 Rosecrans Avenue 410 90 , Manhattan Beach , California 90266

Practice Areas: Animal Bites,Automobile Accidents,Construction ,Estate Planning,General Practice,Guardianship and Conservatorship,Land Use & Zoning,Personal Injury,Probate ,Real Estate ,Slip and Fall,Trusts,Wills,Wrongful Death,Zoning, Planning & Land Use

Google Review

“David Simon was phenomenal! He was exceptional with both his communication throughout the process and his follow through with anything he said. I’d recommend him to anyone who want…”

— Julian Sampah

View Profile

David Eisen

555 S Flower St Ste 2900 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Litigation

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Elgin

Firm: Public Defender's Office

2222 M St , Merced , California 95340

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense , Criminal Defense

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Eiseman

Firm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges

50 California Street, 22nd Floor , San Francisco , California 94111

Practice Areas: Corporate , Intellectual Property , Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Edward Hays

Firm: Rus, Miliband and Smith, A Professional Corporation

2600 Michelson Drive Seventh Floor 9 , Irvine , California 92612

Practice Areas: Bankruptcy,Civil ,Debtor/Creditor Rights

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Edward Vallerga

Firm: Vallerga & Vallerga

2130 Ralston Ave 1A , Belmont , California 94002

Practice Areas: Arbitration & Mediation,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Divorce,Family

Avvo Review

“I couldn't afford an attorney to help me with my case. Mr. Vallerga agreed to consult with me for a reasonable hourly rate. I filled out my paperwor...”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Edward Rowe

187 E Wilbur Rd Ste 8 , Thousand Oaks , California 91360

Practice Areas: Immigration, Business, Estate Planning

Avvo Review

“arly a man of great integrity. His advice was always well thought out and pertinent, and he was extr”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Wood

Firm: Law Offices of David E. Wood

1880 Century Park East 612 (Century City) , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Aviation & Aerospace,Civil ,Insurance ,Personal Injury,Wrongful Death

View Profile

Lawyers Rating:

David E. Watson

Firm: Duane Morris LLP

750 B Street , San Diego , California 92101

Practice Areas: Real Estate Law, Land Use, Planning and Entitlement, Environmental Planning Regulation

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Wang

4 Park Plaza 1600 , Irvine , California 92614

Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Elson

Trident Center East Tower , Los Angeles , California 90064

Practice Areas: Civil

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Practice area *

Zip code

Your name *

Email address *

Phone (optional)

Describe your case *

By submitting, you agree to Lawbamba's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Submitting a case description does not create an attorney–client relationship and is not confidential.

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California

California holding deposit | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California I’m located in CA and recently applied to an upstairs apartment on 8/4/26. The next day I was told we were approved and that I needed to come in to drop off a $1,000 “deposit” which I thought was a security deposit. I was trying to put my baby to sleep so my husband dropped it off. Turns out he signed a paper stating it was a holding deposit & that we would be charged if we backed out of renting it. The apartment is currently being renovated so it won’t be ready until mid Sept. We had originally wanted a downstairs unit since we have a small child and two weeks after paying our deposit the manager let us know we could view a downstairs apartment that had just become available. When we viewed it, it was so small and outdated compared to the upstairs unit. She then pointed out that my son may make noise that could bother the downstairs neighbors, we tested the noise level and agreed. It’s not a good fit after all, we told her we changed our mind and today she texted us saying they would be keeping the full amount plus more. She then offered to deduct $500 off first months rent and to offer a 6 month lease instead of 12 so that we wouldn’t “loose the deposit”. Money has been tight and I’m freaking out over the $1,066.66 that they’re keeping. After looking at the holding deposit agreement it…
Being charged with felon in possession of a firearm for a firearm I knew nothing about in a car that’s not mine | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. So about 2 months ago now i was using my buddies vehicle who has a concealed carry license. The car is in his name because it belongs to him. The firearm was in a hidden safe in the bottom of the center console. I guess it was a false bottom. The safe had a biometric fingerprint type thing to gain access to the items inside as well as a PIN code, which I didn’t/don't know. So when I got pulled over it was for window tints. I am searchable because I’m on PRCS for felon in possession of a firearm, which I understand looks bad in this scenario. However it is what it is. I can’t change the past and for this charge right here I am an innocent man in the sense that it's not my firearm and I had no knowledge of the thing being in the car. So when they searched the vehicle they did a real thorough search and after like an hour of sitting in the cop car they came to me and asked me what the code was for the safe. I was confused at first and when they made it clear what they were asking, I told them I don’t know anything about any safe anywhere. So they explain that on the safe, which is hidden at the bottom of the center console, theres a biometric unlock and a keypad to gain access, as well as a physical key, which I…
Dismissing sales personnel after 90 day probationary period ends. Company not paying bonuses / commissions for customer contracts signed during 90 days. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Recently let go after 90 day probationary completed, outside salaried sales position with additional money to be paid for securing signed contracts from new customers. Company committed to pay a % of the sales upon completion of the work at these locations Jobs at new locations can take weeks or months to complete and for the all the costs to reconciled before money is paid out to sales personnel. Typically not a problem if your going to stay and be hired on. It seems that predatory hiring and firing of sales staff is not unusual for this company and have located several others who were also let go after landing contracts and upon completion of their probationary period. No reason given for dismissal No mention of additional money owed ? Has this company found a loophole in the system whereby they are able to keep the commissions for jobs? How are these moneys reported and accounted for ? Is the money due kept by the owner? At some point they had to account for the expenditures of each of these jobs is the money used to offset the labor cost for probationary employees ?. is this something I should pursue ? is it a class action suit because of additional persons ? with whom should I speak ? Location: California
California landlord: AB 1482 exemption notice missing from original lease, added later | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California We own a single-family rental in California. The tenants’ original lease began in 2023 and did not include the AB 1482 single-family home exemption notice. In 2025, after that lease ended, we hired a property manager. They issued a new lease/addendum that did include the AB 1482 exemption language. Our property manager is now telling us that because the exemption notice was missing from the original 2023 lease, the tenancy is still subject to AB 1482. Since we plan to sell the property and remove it from the rental market, they are saying we have to provide one month of rent as relocation assistance, or waive the final month’s rent. My questions are: Does adding the AB 1482 exemption notice in a later lease or renewal make the property exempt going forward, or does the missing notice in the original lease mean the continuous tenancy remains covered by AB 1482? The tenants have also been chronically late with rent for most of the tenancy, often paying after the 12th when rent is due on the 1st, and we have written late-payment notices. Could that repeated pattern support an at-fault just-cause termination under Civil Code § 1946.2, even if they eventually paid each month? We are planning to sell the property and are trying to understand whether a no-fault termination with relocation assistance is really our only option.
Sick time hours I was asked to use were never paid out. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California Here’s my situation. I put in my two weeks notice at my previous employer with my last day being the 11th of August. I had a shift scheduled the 9th in which I called off sick and my boss said hey want me to use sick hours and let’s make today your last day. I said sure given the fact that there was no point in continuing since I was starting my new job already. Thing is I never got paid those sick hours, I even have texts from my boss showing she said she was gonna put in my hours of sick time. I guess my question is I know I can file a claim but will I get paid penalties for that time? I know California treats sick time different than earned time. Should I file just for the missing sick hours or also penalties, anyone can provide clarification thank you

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

Previous 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.