California Lawyers David Dworakowski to David E.

Explore California attorneys like David Dworakowski, David Dworsky, David E. Bocan, David E. Bordon, David E. Boyd, David E. Britton, David E. Bunim, and David E. Ruezga. in cities like Irvine, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco and San Francisco. These attorneys specialize in in Zip codes like 92614, 90071, 94108.

David Dworakow

David E. Crans

David E. Pipal

David E. McAll

David E. Halle

David Dworsky

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David Dworakowski

Firm: Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP

2050 Main Street , Irvine , California 92614

Practice Areas: Family

David Dworakowski is the founding partner of Quinn & Dworakowski, focusing exclusively on family law. He is one of only two attorneys in Orange County to hold dual certification by the State Bar of California as both a Certified Family Law Specialist and a Certified Appellate Law Specialist—a rare distinction that underscores his expertise in handling the most complex family law and appellate matters.. David has successfully tried more than 350 cases and authored more than 150 appeals and writs in both state and federal courts. His exceptional advocacy has earned him recognition as a Super Lawyer for over 15 consecutive years, as well as honors such as Top 100 Trial Lawyer in America and Best Lawyer in Orange County. He is also highly rated by AVVO for client satisfaction.. A graduate of Temple University School of Law, where he served on the Law Review, David combines academic rigor with decades of courtroom experience. Beyond his practice, he serves as a lecturer at Chapman University School of Law and as a Board Member of Mardan School in Irvine, a school for special needs kids, making David uniquely qualified to handle custody cases invloving children with special needs.. Born in Buffalo, he is a lifelong Buffalo Bills fan and now resides in Laguna Beach with his wife, Anita, and their five children. David is also an active member of Saddleback Church.

Avvo Review

“guided me through a challenging family matter with compassion and provided legal solutions that were”

Read on Avvo

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer.”

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Cranston

1900 Avenue of the Stars (Century City)21st Floor , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Environmental ,Insurance

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Yelp Rating:

David E. Pipal

Firm: Paxton O'Brien Law Group, LLP

350 Fifth Street , Hollister , California 95023

Practice Areas: Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Condemnation & Eminent Domain,Constitutional ,Construction ,Contracts,Election Campaign & Political ,Estate Planning,Government Agencies,Government Contracts,Insurance ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Probate ,Real Estate ,Taxation - State & Federal,Trusts,Wills

Yelp Review

“Our experience with Jeremy Liem has been good! Jeremy LISTENED to our concerns and came through with an estate plan that fits our needs in a TIMELY manner....”

Read on Yelp

View Profile

David E. McAllister

4375 Jutland Dr Ste 200 , San Diego , California 92117

Practice Areas: Chapter 11, Chapter 7, Bankruptcy

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Hallett

Firm: Grimm, Vranjes, McCormick and Graham LLP

550 West "C" Street 1100 921 , San Diego , California 92101

Practice Areas: General Practice

Avvo Review

“I feel very fortunate that I found David Hallett. I was in a situation where my client was attempting to enjoy our beautiful cabinetry, breach our pay...”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

David Dworsky

Firm: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

350 S Grand Ave # 40 , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Litigation

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Yelp Rating:

David E. Grande

Firm: Law Office of David E. Grande

43533 Ridge Park Drive H 925 , Temecula , California 92590

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

Avvo Review

“My wife and I were looking for a good lawyer to help my son with a legal situation. We decided to hire Mr. David E. Grande who was very understanding...”

Read on Avvo

Yelp Review

“I can't say enough great things about Mr. Grande and his assistant Christine. They were very compassionate and understanding of the circumstances...”

Read on Yelp

Google Review

“Mr. Grande is a great attorney. I appreciated the in-person consultation and the time spent explaining how he will represent me. He did an amazing job representing me. I highly rec…”

— Jordana Seaman

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Ruezga

28 Geary Street, Suite 650 , San Francisco , California 94108

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Litigation, Lawsuits & Disputes, Business, Domestic Violence, Corporate, Family, LLC

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Boyd

Firm: Boyd and Kimball, LLP

601 University Avenue 264 95 , Sacramento , California 95825

Practice Areas: Aviation & Aerospace,Business ,Civil ,Professional Malpractice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Bunim

Firm: Haas and Najarian

Second Floor 58 Maiden Lane , San Francisco , California 94108

Practice Areas: Civil ,Construction

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Driscoll

Firm: Driscoll and Renolds

6960 Magnolia Avenue 101 925 , Riverside , California 92506

Practice Areas: Housing & Construction Defects

View Profile

David E. Dworsky

Firm: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

333 South Hope Street , Los Angeles , California 90071

Practice Areas: Litigation, Class Action Defense, Insurance Litigation, Insurance

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Britton

Firm: Lockhart & Britton

7777 Alvarado Road 422 , La Mesa , California 91941

Practice Areas: Bankruptcy

Avvo Review

“David and his staff assisted our family with a Chapter 7 BK. We had over $300,000 in IRS tax debt and $70,000 in state tax debt. We also had over $2...”

Read on Avvo

View Profile

David E. Hengstler

Firm: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

650 Town Center Drive , Costa Mesa , California 92626

Practice Areas: Finance, Asset Based Lending, Equipment Leasing, Real Estate Lending, Syndicated Credit Facilities, Mortgage Banking

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Lafitte

Firm: Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth, A Professional Corporation

800 Anacapa Street A , Santa Barbara , California 93101

Practice Areas: General Practice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Mainzer

Firm: Spolin Silverman and Cohen LLP

100 Wilshire Boulevard 1400 , Santa Monica , California 90401

Practice Areas: Banking & Finance,Corporate ,Mergers & Acquisitions,Securities

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Bordon

Firm: Sedgwick, Detert, Moran and Arnold LLP

One Market Plaza Steuart Tower 8th Floor Calif , San Francisco , California 94105

Practice Areas: General Practice

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Mead

Firm: Theodora Oringher Miller and Richman PC

2029 Century Park East Sixth Floor , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Business ,Civil

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Bocan

2049 Century Park East 3400 , Los Angeles , California 90067

Practice Areas: Insurance

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

David E. Rand

Firm: Minton, Minton and Rand

510 West Sixth Street 510 90 , Los Angeles , California 90014

Practice Areas: Business & Commercial,Corporate ,Estate Planning,Real Estate ,Trusts

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Practice area *

Zip code

Your name *

Email address *

Phone (optional)

Describe your case *

By submitting, you agree to Lawbamba's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Submitting a case description does not create an attorney–client relationship and is not confidential.

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California

California holding deposit | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California I’m located in CA and recently applied to an upstairs apartment on 8/4/26. The next day I was told we were approved and that I needed to come in to drop off a $1,000 “deposit” which I thought was a security deposit. I was trying to put my baby to sleep so my husband dropped it off. Turns out he signed a paper stating it was a holding deposit & that we would be charged if we backed out of renting it. The apartment is currently being renovated so it won’t be ready until mid Sept. We had originally wanted a downstairs unit since we have a small child and two weeks after paying our deposit the manager let us know we could view a downstairs apartment that had just become available. When we viewed it, it was so small and outdated compared to the upstairs unit. She then pointed out that my son may make noise that could bother the downstairs neighbors, we tested the noise level and agreed. It’s not a good fit after all, we told her we changed our mind and today she texted us saying they would be keeping the full amount plus more. She then offered to deduct $500 off first months rent and to offer a 6 month lease instead of 12 so that we wouldn’t “loose the deposit”. Money has been tight and I’m freaking out over the $1,066.66 that they’re keeping. After looking at the holding deposit agreement it…
Being charged with felon in possession of a firearm for a firearm I knew nothing about in a car that’s not mine | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California. So about 2 months ago now i was using my buddies vehicle who has a concealed carry license. The car is in his name because it belongs to him. The firearm was in a hidden safe in the bottom of the center console. I guess it was a false bottom. The safe had a biometric fingerprint type thing to gain access to the items inside as well as a PIN code, which I didn’t/don't know. So when I got pulled over it was for window tints. I am searchable because I’m on PRCS for felon in possession of a firearm, which I understand looks bad in this scenario. However it is what it is. I can’t change the past and for this charge right here I am an innocent man in the sense that it's not my firearm and I had no knowledge of the thing being in the car. So when they searched the vehicle they did a real thorough search and after like an hour of sitting in the cop car they came to me and asked me what the code was for the safe. I was confused at first and when they made it clear what they were asking, I told them I don’t know anything about any safe anywhere. So they explain that on the safe, which is hidden at the bottom of the center console, theres a biometric unlock and a keypad to gain access, as well as a physical key, which I…
Dismissing sales personnel after 90 day probationary period ends. Company not paying bonuses / commissions for customer contracts signed during 90 days. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Recently let go after 90 day probationary completed, outside salaried sales position with additional money to be paid for securing signed contracts from new customers. Company committed to pay a % of the sales upon completion of the work at these locations Jobs at new locations can take weeks or months to complete and for the all the costs to reconciled before money is paid out to sales personnel. Typically not a problem if your going to stay and be hired on. It seems that predatory hiring and firing of sales staff is not unusual for this company and have located several others who were also let go after landing contracts and upon completion of their probationary period. No reason given for dismissal No mention of additional money owed ? Has this company found a loophole in the system whereby they are able to keep the commissions for jobs? How are these moneys reported and accounted for ? Is the money due kept by the owner? At some point they had to account for the expenditures of each of these jobs is the money used to offset the labor cost for probationary employees ?. is this something I should pursue ? is it a class action suit because of additional persons ? with whom should I speak ? Location: California
California landlord: AB 1482 exemption notice missing from original lease, added later | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California We own a single-family rental in California. The tenants’ original lease began in 2023 and did not include the AB 1482 single-family home exemption notice. In 2025, after that lease ended, we hired a property manager. They issued a new lease/addendum that did include the AB 1482 exemption language. Our property manager is now telling us that because the exemption notice was missing from the original 2023 lease, the tenancy is still subject to AB 1482. Since we plan to sell the property and remove it from the rental market, they are saying we have to provide one month of rent as relocation assistance, or waive the final month’s rent. My questions are: Does adding the AB 1482 exemption notice in a later lease or renewal make the property exempt going forward, or does the missing notice in the original lease mean the continuous tenancy remains covered by AB 1482? The tenants have also been chronically late with rent for most of the tenancy, often paying after the 12th when rent is due on the 1st, and we have written late-payment notices. Could that repeated pattern support an at-fault just-cause termination under Civil Code § 1946.2, even if they eventually paid each month? We are planning to sell the property and are trying to understand whether a no-fault termination with relocation assistance is really our only option.
Sick time hours I was asked to use were never paid out. | Aug 27, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: California Here’s my situation. I put in my two weeks notice at my previous employer with my last day being the 11th of August. I had a shift scheduled the 9th in which I called off sick and my boss said hey want me to use sick hours and let’s make today your last day. I said sure given the fact that there was no point in continuing since I was starting my new job already. Thing is I never got paid those sick hours, I even have texts from my boss showing she said she was gonna put in my hours of sick time. I guess my question is I know I can file a claim but will I get paid penalties for that time? I know California treats sick time different than earned time. Should I file just for the missing sick hours or also penalties, anyone can provide clarification thank you

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

Previous 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.